The article is a historical analysis of the 1866 Midterm Election, likely providing historical context behind contemporary politics as per Heather Cox Richardson's usual approach. However, the excerpt lacks visible reflective personal writing, detailed mechanism explanations, or specific lived experience developing into broader ideas about agency, craft, or relationships. It aligns less with the preference for essays on personal agency, feedback loops, or creative work, and more with political history reporting. The style is presumably clear and substantial, but the text shown does not demonstrate engagement with the reader's prioritized themes like agency, creative learning, or deep institutional analysis beyond basic historical narrative. Thus, it fits a neutral interest level based on the supplied preferences and available content.
How this was scored
- Rule
- María’s reading compass · v2
- Provider / model
- openai / gpt-4.1-mini
- Scored
- 2026-11-04T11:17:30+00:00
- Source text
- Revision 694 · full
- Text selection
- All available text
- Prompt / schema
- reader-1 / reaction-1
- Feedback used
- 0 examples from your reactions and notes
- Tokens in / out
- 1343 / 208
- Estimated cost
- $0.000870
- Run
- #12
Exact rule used
This is an editable starter reading profile inferred from my existing subscriptions and a set of articles shared with me. Treat the examples as exploratory positive signals, not as confirmed favorite articles or evidence that I agree with their arguments.
Prioritize thoughtful essays about agency and how people build a life: learning, feedback loops, creative work, finding one's craft, relationships, friendship, conversation, and attention. Look for specific lived experience that develops into an interesting, useful idea. Make room for literary criticism, art, design, history, institutional analysis, and substantial book reviews.
Also consider AI, technology, startups, product strategy, and venture investing, reflecting my subscription mix. Favor explanations of mechanisms, concrete examples, original reporting or analysis, and arguments that acknowledge uncertainty. A piece should offer more than a headline, a trend summary, or a promotional pitch. Do not infer my political views or endorsement from the sources I follow.
Reward clear, distinctive prose and real intellectual substance. Both reflective personal writing and technically detailed analysis can fit. Length is fine when it earns its space. As an initial hypothesis, downrank repetitive advice, vague inspiration, generic hot takes, and hype unsupported by evidence. These style preferences are provisional and can be corrected with my feedback. Evaluate English and Spanish writing on substance without preferring one language.
When explaining a prediction, identify the specific connection to these themes and any mismatch. Do not give a high score solely because an author appears in my subscriptions or examples. Evaluate only the supplied article text; a title or paywall preview is not proof of the full argument.
Reference titles (sample signals; not actual ratings):
- For a long time, nothing. Then, suddenly one has the right eyes.
- Love is to be invested in someone’s continual expansion
- How to walk through walls
- Book Review: From Bauhaus To Our House
- half the world's writing should remain unpublished
- We think better when our minds are entwined
- The Hacking Will Continue While Market Morale Improves
- the delight of specificity
- Why we ended up homeschooling
- Bangers from Gibbon
- searching for your life's work is a multi-turn endeavor
- Why I Changed My Mind About AI Risk
- The hyperlocal
- The Specter Of Neuralese
- Your Book Review: Lee Kuan Yew's Memoirs
- Agentic fragments
- Average moments of a long-term meditator
- a case for sharing your dreams with friends
- the best conversations help you hear yourself
- First we shape our feedback loops; then they shape us
- timing
Exact article input
Letters from an American
The 1866 Midterm Election
1,881
48
279
1
×
0:00
Current time
:
0:00
/
Total time
:
-11:20
-11:20
Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade.
The 1866 Midterm Election
Heather Cox Richardson
Nov 01, 2026
1,881
48
279
Share
Transcript
To read this letter, click
here:
Listen on Apple Podcasts
Listen on Spotify
You can also find Heather at:
YouTube
Bluesky
Instagram
Facebook
Threads
TikTok
Discussion about this episode
Comments
Restacks
Letters from an American
Heather Cox Richardson's narrated newsletter about the history behind today's politics.
Heather Cox Richardson's narrated newsletter about the history behind today's politics.
Listen on
Substack App
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
YouTube
RSS Feed
Appears in episode
Heather Cox Richardson
Recent Episodes
Intending to Steal
Nov 2
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Not Moving the Needle, Anywhere
Oct 31
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Free and Fair Elections
Oct 30
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Signs of MAGA Collapse
Oct 29
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Manipulating the Media
Oct 29
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Erratic and Corrupt
Oct 27
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Momentum
Oct 26
•
Heather Cox Richardson
Input metadata
{"authors":"Heather Cox Richardson","availability":"full","canonical_url":"https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com/p/the-1866-election","publication":"Letters from an American","publication_id":68,"published_at":"2026-11-01T19:52:27+00:00","subtitle":"To read this letter, click here:","title":"The 1866 Midterm Election"}